Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Segregation Forms
Random Page
Add or Edit Entries
Recent changes
An Ontology of Segregation
About Segregation Wiki
Search
Search
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Spatial economic segregation
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===== Date and country of first publication<ref>Date and country of first publication as informed by the Scopus database (December 2023).</ref>===== 2012<br> Canada ===== Definition ===== Spatial economic segregation refers to the division and separation of different socioeconomic groups within a geographic area. It occurs when people from different income levels or social classes, such as low-income versus high-income individuals, tend to live in separate neighborhoods or areas. This segregation can be based on factors like housing costs, access to amenities, and quality of public services. Factors that contribute to spatial economic segregation include: 1. Housing prices: In many cities, housing costs vary significantly, making certain neighborhoods affordable only to wealthier individuals or families, leading to the concentration of higher-income residents in certain areas. 2. Gentrification: Gentrification is the process of renovating and improving neighborhoods, often leading to an increase in property values. This can result in the displacement of low-income residents who can no longer afford to live in the area, further segregating socioeconomic groups. 3. Zoning and land-use policies: Some cities have zoning regulations that separate residential areas from commercial or industrial areas. This can affect the availability of affordable housing and contribute to spatial economic segregation. 4. Transportation infrastructure: Limited access to efficient and affordable transportation can limit economic opportunities for low-income individuals, leading to their concentration in specific areas with lower mobility options. 5. Educational opportunities: Unequal distribution of quality schools affects the educational opportunities available to children from different socioeconomic backgrounds. This can lead to the clustering of wealthier families in neighborhoods with better schools. Spatial economic segregation can have numerous negative impacts on society, including perpetuating income inequality, limiting social mobility, and exacerbating disparities in access to resources and opportunities. Efforts to reduce spatial economic segregation often involve policies that promote affordable housing initiatives, equitable distribution of public services, and investment in disadvantaged communities. ==See also== ==Related segregation forms== Spatial economic segregation is frequently discussed in the literature with the following segregation forms: [[economic segregation]] [[File:spatial_economic_segregation.png|780x780px]] This visualization is based on the study [[Segregation_Wiki:About| The Multidisciplinary Landscape of Segregation Research]]. For the complete network of interrelated segregation forms, please refer to: * [https://tinyurl.com/2235lkhw First year of publication] * [https://tinyurl.com/2d8wg5n3 Louvain clusters] * [https://tinyurl.com/223udk5r Betweenness centrality] * [https://tinyurl.com/244d8unz Disciplines in which segregation forms first emerged (Scopus database).] ==References== ==Notes== <references /> {{NoteAI}} ==Spatial economic segregation appears in the following literature== Chen W.-H., Myles J., Picot G. (2012). Why Have Poorer Neighbourhoods Stagnated Economically while the Richer Have Flourished? Neighbourhood Income Inequality in Canadian Cities. ''Urban Studies'', ''49''(4), 877-896. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098011408142 Jimenez B.S. (2016). Externalities in the Fragmented Metropolis: Local Institutional Choices and the Efficiency Equity Trade Off. ''American Review of Public Administration'', ''46''(3), 314-336. SAGE Publications Inc..https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074014550703
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Segregation Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Segregation Wiki:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Template used on this page:
Template:NoteAI
(
view source
) (protected)
Toggle limited content width