Editing Entrepreneurial segregation

===== Date and country of first publication<ref>Date and country of first publication as informed by the Scopus database (December 2023).</ref>===== 
2009<br>
United Kingdom
===== Definition ===== 

Entrepreneurial segregation refers to the unequal distribution of entrepreneurial opportunities and resources based on factors such as race, gender, socio-economic status, and geographical location. It is a concept that describes how certain groups face systemic barriers and discrimination that limit their access to funding, networks, mentorship, and other resources needed to start and grow businesses.

Entrepreneurial segregation can manifest in various ways. For example, women and minority entrepreneurs often face challenges in securing funding due to biases and lack of representation in venture capital and angel investment networks. This leads to a lack of diversity in the entrepreneurial ecosystem, as certain groups are disproportionately excluded from opportunities to innovate and create wealth.

Geographical location can also contribute to entrepreneurial segregation. Startups and entrepreneurial activities tend to be concentrated in urban areas with robust ecosystems, leaving rural and disadvantaged communities with limited access to resources and support. This further exacerbates existing inequalities and limits economic development in these areas.

Addressing entrepreneurial segregation requires efforts to promote inclusivity and diversity in entrepreneurship. This includes supporting initiatives that provide equitable access to funding, mentorship, and networks for underrepresented groups. It also involves creating policies that foster entrepreneurship in marginalized communities and reducing barriers to entry for aspiring entrepreneurs. By leveling the playing field, the entrepreneurial ecosystem can become more inclusive and equitable, allowing for the full potential of all entrepreneurs to be realized.
==See also== 
==Related segregation forms==
Entrepreneurial segregation is frequently discussed in the literature with the following segregation forms: 

[[horizontal segregation]]
[[File:entrepreneurial_segregation.png|780x780px]]

This visualization is based on the study [[Segregation_Wiki:About| The Multidisciplinary Landscape of Segregation Research]]. 

For the complete network of interrelated segregation forms, please refer to: 

* [https://tinyurl.com/2235lkhw First year of publication] 

* [https://tinyurl.com/2d8wg5n3 Louvain clusters] 

* [https://tinyurl.com/223udk5r Betweenness centrality] 

* [https://tinyurl.com/244d8unz Disciplines in which segregation forms first emerged (Scopus database).] 
==References== 
==Notes== 
<references /> 
{{NoteAI}} 
==Entrepreneurial segregation appears in the following literature== 

Sappleton N. (2009). Women non traditional entrepreneurs and social capital. ''International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship'', ''1''(3), 192-218. https://doi.org/10.1108/17566260910990892

Sappleton N. (2018). Gender and business performance: the role of entrepreneurial segregation. ''Women Entrepreneurs and the Myth of 'Underperformance': A New Look at Women's Entrepreneurship Research'', 213-229. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd..https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786434500.00025

Sappleton N. (2018). Gender Congruity, Childlessness and Success in Entrepreneurship: An Intersectional Bourdieusian Analysis. ''Voluntary and Involuntary Childlessness: The Joys of Otherhood?'', 283-305. Emerald Group Publishing Ltd..https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78754-361-420181013