Editing Disciplinary segregation

===== Date and country of first publication<ref>Date and country of first publication as informed by the Scopus database (December 2023).</ref>===== 
1983<br>
United States
===== Definition ===== 

Disciplinary segregation is a form of punishment in which a prisoner is isolated in a separate area within a prison for a specific period of time as a result of violating prison rules or regulations. This type of segregation is often used as a means of maintaining order and discipline within a prison, and can involve the prisoner being placed in a separate cell, restricted from participating in certain activities, and limited in their interactions with other inmates.
==See also== 
==Related segregation forms==
Disciplinary segregation is frequently discussed in the literature with the following segregation forms: 

[[administrative segregation]]
[[File:disciplinary_segregation.png|780x780px]]

This visualization is based on the study [[Segregation_Wiki:About| The Multidisciplinary Landscape of Segregation Research]]. 

For the complete network of interrelated segregation forms, please refer to: 

* [https://tinyurl.com/2235lkhw First year of publication] 

* [https://tinyurl.com/2d8wg5n3 Louvain clusters] 

* [https://tinyurl.com/223udk5r Betweenness centrality] 

* [https://tinyurl.com/244d8unz Disciplines in which segregation forms first emerged (Scopus database).] 
==References== 
==Notes== 
<references /> 
{{NoteAI}} 
==Disciplinary segregation appears in the following literature== 

Hanson R.W., Moss C.S., Hosford R.E., Johnson M.E. (1983). Predicting inmate penitentiary adjustment: An Assessment of Four Classificatory Methods. ''Criminal Justice and Behavior'', ''10''(3), 293-309. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854883010003006

Davis E.D., Esbensen F.-A. (1985). Demographic profile of offenders in long term disciplinary segregation. ''American Journal of Criminal Justice'', ''9''(2), 122-137. Springer-Verlag.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02887262

Davis E.D., Esbensen F.-A. (1986). Predicting troublemaking offenders: A discriminant analysis. ''American Journal of Criminal Justice'', ''11''(1), 23-37. Springer-Verlag.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02889819

Jones J.A. (2). Prisoner litigation and the mistake of Jenkins v. Haubert. ''Cornell Law Review'', ''86''(1), 140-141. https://doi.org/

Coid J.W., Petruckevitch A., Bebbington P., Jenkins R., Brugha T., Lewis G., Farrell M., Singleton N. (2003). Psychiatric morbidity in prisoners and solitary cellular confinement, I: Disciplinary segregation. ''Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology'', ''14''(2), 298-319. Routledge.https://doi.org/10.1080/1478994031000095510

Arrigo B.A., Bullock J.L. (2008). The psychological effects of solitary confinement on prisoners in supermax units: Reviewing what we know and recommending what should change. ''International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology'', ''52''(6), 622-640. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X07309720

Arrigo B.A., Bersot H.Y., Sellers B.G. (2011). The Ethics of Total Confinement: A Critique of Madness, Citizenship, and Social Justice. ''The Ethics of Total Confinement: A Critique of Madness, Citizenship, and Social Justice'', 1-320. Oxford University Press.https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195372212.001.0001

Rivera T. (2013). You have to be what you're talking about: Youth poets, amateur counter conduct, and parrhesiastic value in the amateur youth poetry slam. ''Performance Research'', ''18''(2), 114-123. https://doi.org/10.1080/13528165.2013.807175

Parker I. (2013). Micro nations of the self in times of war: Discourse analysis and psychology. ''Universitas Psychologica'', ''12''(1), 301-312. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana.https://doi.org/10.11144/javeriana.upsy12-1.mtga

Birke L., Bryld M., Lykke N. (2013). Animal performances: An exploration of intersections between feminist science studies and studies of human /animal relationships. ''Women, Science, and Technology: A Reader in Feminist Science Studies'', 495-506. Taylor and Francis.https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203427415-42

Crichton H., Ricciardelli R. (2016). Shifting Grounds: Experiences of Canadian Provincial Correctional Officers. ''Criminal Justice Review'', ''41''(4), 427-445. SAGE Publications Inc..https://doi.org/10.1177/0734016816669981

Butler H.D., Steiner B. (2017). Examining the Use of Disciplinary Segregation within and across Prisons. ''Justice Quarterly'', ''34''(2), 248-271. Routledge.https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2016.1162319

Landfester U., Metelmann J. (2018). Transformative management education: The role of the humanities and social sciences. ''Transformative Management Education: The Role of the Humanities and Social Sciences'', 1-173. Taylor and Francis Inc..https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429022005

Clark K. (2018). The Effect of Mental Illness on Segregation Following Institutional Misconduct. ''Criminal Justice and Behavior'', ''45''(9), 1363-1382. SAGE Publications Inc..https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854818766974

Severson R.E. (2019). Gender Differences in Mental Health, Institutional Misconduct, and Disciplinary Segregation. ''Criminal Justice and Behavior'', ''46''(12), 1719-1737. SAGE Publications Inc..https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854819869039

Campagna M.F., Kowalski M.A., Drapela L.A., Stohr M.K., Tollefsbol E.T., Woo Y., Mei X., Hamilton Z.K. (2019). Understanding Offender Needs Over Forms of Isolation Using a Repeated Measures Design. ''Prison Journal'', ''99''(6), 639-661. SAGE Publications Inc..https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885519877356

Lucas J.W., Jones M.A. (2019). An Analysis of the Deterrent Effects of Disciplinary Segregation on Institutional Rule Violation Rates. ''Criminal Justice Policy Review'', ''30''(5), 765-787. SAGE Publications Inc..https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403417699930

Wildeman C., Andersen L.H. (202). Long term consequences of being placed in disciplinary segregation†. ''Criminology'', ''58''(3), 423-453. Blackwell Publishing Inc..https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12241

Woo Y., Drapela L., Campagna M., Stohr M.K., Hamilton Z.K., Mei X., Tollefsbol E.T. (202). Disciplinary Segregation’s Effects on Inmate Behavior: Institutional and Community Outcomes. ''Criminal Justice Policy Review'', ''31''(7), 1036-1058. SAGE Publications Inc..https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403419862338

Labrecque R.M., Mears D.P., Smith P. (202). Gender and the Effect of Disciplinary Segregation on Prison Misconduct. ''Criminal Justice Policy Review'', ''31''(8), 1193-1216. SAGE Publications Inc..https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403419884728

Butler H.D., Steiner B., Makarios M.D., Travis L.F., III (202). An Examination of the Influence of Exposure to Disciplinary Segregation on Recidivism. ''Crime and Delinquency'', ''66''(4), 485-512. SAGE Publications Inc..https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128719869194

Zgoba K.M., Pizarro J.M., Salerno L.M. (202). Assessing the Impact of Restrictive Housing on Inmate Post Release Criminal Behavior. ''American Journal of Criminal Justice'', ''45''(1), 102-125. Springer.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-019-09496-2

Salerno L.M., Zgoba K.M. (202). Disciplinary Segregation and Its Effects on In Prison Outcomes. ''Prison Journal'', ''100''(1), 74-97. SAGE Publications Inc..https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885519882326

Boda P.A. (2021). The Conceptual and Disciplinary Segregation of Disability: a Phenomenography of Science Education Graduate Student Learning. ''Research in Science Education'', ''51''(6), 1725-1758. Springer Science and Business Media B.V..https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-9828-x

Motz R.T., Labrecque R.M., Smith P. (2021). Gang affiliation, restrictive housing, and institutional misconduct: does disciplinary segregation suppress or intensify gang member rule violations?. ''Journal of Crime and Justice'', ''44''(1), 49-65. Routledge.https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2020.1772095

Anderson C.N., Cochran J.C., Wooldredge J. (2022). Is Reduced Visitation a Collateral Consequence of Restrictive Housing?. ''Criminal Justice and Behavior'', ''49''(10), 1495-1515. SAGE Publications Inc..https://doi.org/10.1177/00938548221105238

Batastini A.B., Davis R.M., Jones A.C.T., Horton J. (2022). Treating Women Incarcerated in or At Risk of Restrictive Placements: A Statement of the Problem and Considerations for Practice. ''Psychological Services'', ''19''(4), 648-657. American Psychological Association.https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000623

Meyers T.J., Wright K.A., Phillips S. (2022). Redefining Disciplinary Segregation: Perceptions of Effective Programming Among Program Participants and Staff. ''Criminal Justice Policy Review'', ''33''(7), 756-784. SAGE Publications Inc..https://doi.org/10.1177/08874034221079301